Skip to content

Section 01 / IndexVCUK-WEB-004 · S.01

References we actually use.

This sheet is maintained as a working reference for clients, associates and fellow practitioners across the defence acquisition community — the organisations, institutions and bodies that frame the work described elsewhere in this document set. It is kept the way we keep everything: numbered, annotated and reviewed.

Each entry carries a line of context and its web address, cited in full so it can be checked at source. Citation is not endorsement, and no affiliation is implied unless stated. If a reference you rely on is missing — or one listed here has lapsed — tell us. An index improves the way any controlled document does: by amendment.

Entries
16
Groups
3
Reviewed
2026-07
Status
Issued

Section 02 / MoD & Government6 lines · VCUK-WEB-004

The client side of the desk.

The bodies that define how UK defence equipment is procured, supported, regulated and cleared — the landscape every programme we support operates within.

MG-01

Ministry of Defence

The department in which every UK equipment programme ultimately sits — policy, organisation and published guidance.

gov.uk › ministry-of-defence
MG-02

Defence Equipment & Support

The MoD's equipment procurement and support organisation at Abbey Wood — the working home of Defence Equipment Acquisition.

des.mod.uk
MG-03

Defence Science & Technology Laboratory

The MoD's own science and technology laboratory — the analysis and evidence base behind acquisition decisions.

gov.uk › defence-science-and-technology-laboratory
MG-04

Defence Safety Authority

The MoD's independent safety regulator — the authority a Safety Case is ultimately written to satisfy.

gov.uk › defence-safety-authority
MG-05

UK Defence Standardization

Custodian of the Defence Standards — the Def Stan backbone that frames ILS and supportability deliverables.

gov.uk › uk-defence-standardization
MG-06

United Kingdom Security Vetting

The government's vetting authority — the body behind the SC clearances our consultants hold.

gov.uk › united-kingdom-security-vetting

Section 03 / Professional Institutions6 lines · VCUK-WEB-004

Where the standard is set.

The institutions and framework custodians that define professional practice in the engineering and project management disciplines Victory consultants work in.

PI-01

Association for Project Management

The chartered body for the project profession — the benchmark for P3M practice in the UK.

apm.org.uk
PI-02

Engineering Council

Regulator of the UK engineering profession — holds the national register and sets the standard for chartered and incorporated engineers.

engc.org.uk
PI-03

Institution of Engineering & Technology

One of the world's largest engineering institutions — professional home to engineers across the disciplines defence draws on.

theiet.org
PI-04

Institution of Mechanical Engineers

The professional institution for mechanical engineering — much of defence equipment's engineering heartland.

imeche.org
PI-05

PeopleCert

Custodian of the PRINCE2 and ITIL frameworks in which Victory consultants are qualified.

peoplecert.org
PI-06

Safety & Reliability Society

The professional society for safety and reliability practitioners — the community of practice around Safety Cases and R&M.

sars.org.uk

Section 04 / Industry & Community4 lines · VCUK-WEB-004

The industry, organised.

The associations through which the defence industry speaks with one voice — national bodies first, then the south coast community Victory Consulting works from.

IC-01

ADS Group

The UK trade association for aerospace, defence, security and space — the industry's collective voice.

adsgroup.org.uk
IC-02

Team Defence Information

The joint MoD–industry association for through-life information and data in defence support.

teamdefence.info
IC-03

techUK

The technology trade association — its defence programme covers the digital side of the sector.

techuk.org

Amendments

Propose an amendment to this sheet.

If an organisation belongs on this index — or a reference here has lapsed — send it over with a line of context. Suggestions from practitioners are what keep a working reference worth keeping. And if what you actually have is a requirement, skip the index and speak to us directly.